Free-ads - Forum News and columns Features & Interviews Film links Calendar dates for festivals Contact details Statistical Info Funding Info
site web
About Netribution Contact Netribution Search Netribution
latest news / northern exposure / industry buzz / festivals, events & awards / euro film news
netribution > news > northern exposure >
 

by james macgregor | May 18th, 2001 | contact: james@netribution.co.uk

Lee Defends Lottery Film Investment

James Lee, the chairman of Scottish Screen, the public film agency in Scotland, has reacted angrily to revelations in The Scotsman about the lack of a commercial film industry in Scotland, despite a six-year policy to use lottery cash to create one.

Mr Lee blamed the current situation on earlier decisions of the Scottish Arts Council. Scottish Screen took over responsibility for awarding lottery funding to Scottish film makers last year, under the orders of the then culture minister, Sam Galbraith.

Previous to that, the Scottish Arts Council (SAC) had responsibility for subsidising film, however a string of commercially-disastrous film investments, coupled with accusations of cronyism from industry heavyweights like Bill Forsyth, led to Mr Galbraith side-lining the SAC.

Mr Lee has more than 20 years’ experience in the film industry, including being a moving force behind Goldcrest films, makers of Chariots of Fire and The Mission. Later, Goldcrest was bankrupted by the failure of the movie Revolution, staring Al Pacino.

When Mr Lee was appointed to be chairman of Scottish Screen three years ago, he had asked Mr Galbraith to hand responsibility for funding awards to his board.

Says Mr Lee: "I was not prepared to continue as chairman on any other basis."

Mr Galbraith agreed and responsibility was transferred to Scottish Screen in April last year. Lee regards this as one of his major achievements as chairman.

Under Mr Lee, there has been a change in funding strategy. He wants to back emerging Scottish film talent until the point that they can survive alone in the marketplace.

However, the changes are taking a long time to come to fruition and Scottish Screens current policy may still beseen as contradictory: If Scottish films need to learn to be commercial why subsidise them?

Chaiman Lee robustly defends the emergency financial package that Scottish Screen offered to actor/director Peter Mullan for his film Magdalene. A month ago Mr Mullan needed to raise an additional £400,000 towards his £3 million budget or move the project to Ireland. Scottish Screen had already become the film’s major backer with £500,000 of lottery cash. Now it has offered an extra £150,000.

According to Mr Lee; "The market is not yet ready to back Peter Mullan as a director, but he is undoubtedly one of Scotland’s most accomplished talents."

However, Mr Lee’s detailed explanation of the financing of Magdalene reveals a complex story.

He says: "Once all the rights in Magdalene had been licensed to distributors and sales agents, the market had placed an effective value on the project. That value was about £750,000 yet it could not be made for less than £2 million."

At this stage, with the project clearly uncommercial, Mr Mullan could have been encouraged to go back to the drawing board, in budget or script. But Mr Lee says: "I take the opposite view. We decided to fill the gap."

Mr Lee has wrought other changes. No project will be rejected because it is "too commercial", as was the case under the previous SAC regime.

Mr Lee is dismissing the lottery panel inherited from the SAC regime, said to be responsible for some of the films subsidised which subsequently produced poor showings.

This week...
o
Scottish Screen in Shetland Film Controversy >>>
o Scotland’s Mansions put on the Movie Map >>>
o Edinburgh Conservatives decry refugee video diary project >>>
o Who Dressed Harry Potter? >>>
archive >>>

Copyright © Netribution Ltd 1999-2002
searchhomeabout usprivacy policy