Skip to main content

Setback for Network Neutrality as US Department of Justice rejects it

 netneutralpricingThe US Department of Justice has declared themselves against Network Neutrality. The background of this issue is  that ISPs and internet providers earn £15 and upwards a month for providing access to the Internet. But unlike similar subscription services such as Sky Movies and Virgin cable, they don't pay for the content on the Internet. They don't even cover the costs of your phone line. They just provide the means for you to get more data down your phone line than you normally would.

That said, no one really minds, they do a job that needs doing and they make up for the crummy deal with dependable access and decent telephone support (ahem). 

However, strangely, these telecoms companies, aren't satisified with the deal, and have decided that in future the costs of providing this more-data-down-your-phone-line-than-before service to customers is going to go up so much that they're going to need to start charging content producers to send data down that phone line. ie YouTube, the BBC and even you and me. 


Which, as you can imagine, apart from being a little ungrateful, in light of the billions of pounds us content producers are earning the cable and telecoms companies, means that the web will no longer be the free equal level playing field it currently is. Those who can afford to show their content on the web at high speeds will manage to, while those who don't, won't. It removes the founding neutral principle of the internet whereby all data is equal, whether it has come from a Google server in California, or a home in Shanghai.  

Some even suggest that this is a backdoor way for powers to censor the web, given that the most controversial or critical sources of news, video or comment are most commonly from people not rolling in cash. Intentional or not, censorship is an inevitable consequence, and anyone who wants to avoid a future where all content distribution is in the hands of a few rich megacorporations should probably write to their MP or senator, or at least join the campaign.


by nic

Published 06 September 2007